Field durability of Mimosa caesalpiniifolia and Mimosa tenuiflora woods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53661/1806-9088202650264102Keywords:
Wood deterioration, Natural weathering, Field decay testAbstract
Using native woods in their original state as posts, fences and contractions is an environmentally and economically friendly initiative, as it reduces the need for wood preservation chemicals. However, each species must be assessed for its natural durability to determine whether it is suitable for such ends. The present work aimed to evaluate the natural durability of round wood pieces of Mimosa caesalpiniifolia and Mimosa tenuiflora after three years of service in the field and to compare their deterioration levels with those found for nontreated and treated Eucalyptus wood with Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA). Round wood pieces, 1 m long, with an average diameter of 10 to 15 cm, were partially buried in the soil to a depth of half their length in a field experiment. Additionally, test specimens of M. caesalpiniifolia and M. tenuiflora (30 replicates for each species) were buried using the same experimental design. All wood samples were left in the field for three years and were periodically assessed to determine the extent of deterioration. Both experiments were set according to an entirely randomized block design (RBD). After exposure the deterioration index and decay susceptibility were determined. Experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance, and when significant differences were established, the means were compared using the Tukey test. The results, particularly the decay susceptibility index, showed that M. caesalpiniifolia and M. tenuiflora performed worse than the reference samples of CCAtreated Eucalyptus. However, their performance was similar. These results highlight that both species studied produce durable woods suitable for outdoor use and direct contact with the soil.
Keywords: Wood deterioration, Natural weathering, Field decay test
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Árvore

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All authors agreed to submit the work to Revista Árvore and granted the exclusive license to publish the article. The authors affirm that it is an original work and has not been previously published elsewhere. The scientific content and opinions expressed in the article are the sole responsibility of the authors and reflect their opinions, not necessarily representing the opinions of the editorial board of Revista Árvore or of the Society of Forest Investigations (SIF).

