PRODUCTION AND FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY IN SILVOPASTORAL SYSTEM IN SMALL RURAL PROPERTY

Authors

  • Daniele Bernardy Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Florestal, Santa Maria, RS - Brasil
  • Luana de Campos de Jesus Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Mestra em Engenharia Florestal, Santa Maria, RS - Brasil
  • Matheus Morais Ziembowicz Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Florestal, Santa Maria, RS - Brasil
  • Elenice Broetto Weiler Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Doutora em Engenharia Florestal, Santa Maria, RS - Brasil
  • Jorge Antonio de Farias Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Departamento de Ciências Florestais, Santa Maria, RS - Brasil

Keywords:

Family farming, Tropical wood, Forest production

Abstract

The implementation of silvopastoral systems (SPS) on properties that have family farming is an alternative to diversify land use, to acquire more than one production good, and diversify income generation. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the financial viability and quantify the volume of the forest component in an SPS with a spacing of 3.0 m x 20.0 m for multiple uses, carried out at 4 years of age for a 16-year rotation. For the analysis of financial viability, we used project analysis criteria such as: net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) for a 16-year horizon with rate benchmarks interest rate of 3%, 4.5% and 10%. Based on the financial analysis criteria, the tree component of the system is viable, as it presented an NPV greater than zero, IRR exceeding the minimum attractiveness rate and BCR greater than 1 for all rates analyzed. The estimated production of the forest component was 257.28 m3/ha in 16 years. Thus, it can be concluded that the forest component in the arrangement of 3.0 m x 20.0 m at 16 years of age, provides a financial return for the small rural property. Therefore, it is a system that brings several economic and environmental advantages, optimizing the use of land, diversifying the production of the small property, generating income, bringing benefits to the reduction of methane gas (CH4) emissions, and assists in carbon sequestration (CO2).

Keywords: Family farming; Eucalyptus ; forest production

Downloads

Published

2022-08-01

How to Cite

Bernardy, D., de Jesus, L. de C., Ziembowicz, M. M., Weiler, E. B., & de Farias, J. A. (2022). PRODUCTION AND FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY IN SILVOPASTORAL SYSTEM IN SMALL RURAL PROPERTY. Revista Árvore, 46(1), https://doi.org/10.1590/1806–908820220000022. Retrieved from https://revistaarvore.ufv.br/rarv/article/view/262182

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.